CONCEPTS
JOURNALS
EXPLORE
Academic Commons
Chronicle of Higher Education
SFC NYC 2011
Larry Lessig, Harvard Berkman Klein
Jonathon Richter, Immersive Learning Research Network
Doug Blandy, UO Folklore
Mark Johnson, UO Philosophy
Antonio Lopez, John Cabot Univ.
Victoria Vensa, UCLA Art|Sci
Berkeley DMAX/BAMPFA
Berkman Center, Dana Boyd
Berkman Center Harvard Law
MediaBerkman Harvard Law
Bioneers Collective Heritage Institute
Cardozo Law, Susan Crawford
Complexity Digest
Cooperation Commons *
Digital Humanities UCLA
• welcome
Harvard Free Culture Computer Society
Santa Fe Institute
Intl. Society for Systems Sciences
New England Complex Systems Institute
Institute for Ethics and Emerging Tech
Kairos: Rhetoric, Tech, Pedagogy
MediaTropes
MIT CMS New Media Literacies
• NML Blog
MIT Center for Civic Media
Music Cognition Matters
New Media Consortium
Pressthink, New York University
On The Commons
Open Source Lab, Oregon State Univ.
Our (and Your) RISD
Regenerative & Permaculture Institutes
Creative Commons
Stanford Archeolog
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Stanford Humanities Lab
Stanford Metamedia
Stanford MetaverseU *
Stanford Open Source Lab
Stanford Philosophy Talk
Uplift Academy, Tom Munnecke
Contribute
There are 3 unlogged users and 0 registered users online.
You can log-in or register for a user account here. |
Monday, November 03, 2003 - 06:06 PM
While critics grow more concerned each day about the insecurity of electronic voting machines, Australians designed a system two years ago that addressed and eased most of those concerns: They chose to make the software running their system completely open to public scrutiny.
Although a private Australian company designed the system, it was based on specifications set by independent election officials, who posted the code on the Internet for all to see and evaluate. What's more, it was accomplished from concept to product in six months. It went through a trial run in a state election in 2001.
Critics say the development process is a model for how electronic voting machines should be made in other countries. Called eVACS, or Electronic Voting and Counting System, the system was created by a company called Software Improvements to run on Linux, an open-source operating system available on the Internet. from Wired Magazine Article: Aussies Do It Right: E-Voting By Kim Zetter Nov. 03, 2003 PT "Instead of paying lawyers to threaten its critics, [e-voting companies] should invest in creating electronic voting machines that include voter-verified paper ballots and other security protections," said EFF Legal Director Cindy Cohn. more resouce links: • Electronic Frontier Foundation • Chilling Effects Clearinghouse
|
GETTING STARTED
INTERNET ARCHIVE
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION
PUBLIC LEARNING
OPEN COURSEWARE
OPEN DL, ML, & RL
       • Deep Learning OPEN FORGES
OPEN METAVERSE
       • Blender [3D Suite]
OPEN ACCESS
OPEN WEBCASTS
OPEN MOVIES
FREE CULTURE +
OPEN ACCESS TEXTS
Blog. Cliff Gerrish - Echovar
Blog. Solving For Pattern
Blog. PaulBHartzog
Blog. Dave Pollard
Blog. George Por
Electronic Frontier Foundation [EFF]
Free Software Foundation News
Login
Future of the Book
Groklaw
High Fidelity Dreams Scott Draves
H+ magazine
IFTF Future Now
Kolabora Collaboration
Make Magazine & Craft Zine
Nation of Makers
Neurotechnology Zack Lynch
NextNow Collaborative
Unconference.net
Valley Zen
Visual Complexity
Wikinews
WorldChanging
|